Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Is it safe to try IPC share only and not retry with any normal tcon in > the case of ENOTCONN like the current code does? ENOTCONN was returned when SMB2_ioctl(with_ipc=true) was called and no ipc was available so I believe it is functionnaly equivalent currently. Unless other NT_STATUS mapped to ENOTCONN can be returned in that scenario but I don't think it can. While rebasing this on top of Steve's for-next I've realized since IPC is not part of the tcon list anymore it's not automatically reconnected. I have to do more testing :( -- Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3 SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
