Thanks. It is the __u8 Buffer[1] in the structure that is causing it. I will resend after I fix it and audit all other Buffer[1] in the request structures. Any particular reason we don't use __u8 Buffer[0] instead? On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:46 AM, Aurélien Aptel <aaptel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > I've looked at a network trace: after the patches when doing a setinfo > on the same file, the netbios length is 1 byte bigger and thus probably > wrong (server replies with a OBJECT_NAME_COLLISION error). > > -- > Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team > GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3 > SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
