Re: [PATCH 0/4][cifs-utils] Improvement and fixes for command line options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 18:54 +0000, Germano Percossi wrote:
> The way command line parsing for mount is done, is not aligned with the
> corresponding kernel module.
> 
> Options checking is not strict, some options the cifs module accepts
> are not honoured, others are accepted (and converted) even though
> they are not documented nor otherwise accepted in the cifs module.
> 
> Moreover, it is not possible to send an empty domain without receiving an
> error, while the cifs module treats the 2 cases slightly differently.
> 
> The other 2 patches are trivial
> 
> Germano Percossi (4):
>   [cifs-utils] Removed extra comma in front of domain
>   [cifs-utils] Accept empty domains on the command line
>   [cifs-utils] Fixed command line parsing and aligned with kernel
>   [cifs-utils] Remove unneeded stdbool header in mount.cifs
> 
>  mount.cifs.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 

Thanks. Patches 1, 3 and 4 look fine. I'm not quite sold yet on #2
though since I'm a little unclear on when you'd want to do either.

Either way, it would also be nice to flesh out the domain= section of
the mount.cifs manpage as well. It's a little thin...

Thanks,
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux