On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 11:59 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 11:43:19PM -0500, Steve French wrote: >> If you are planning to merge it in next few weeks (they fix bugs, and >> are safe so why not), I can simply just back out my changes from >> cifs-2.6.git for-next branch and let you merge the trivial checkpatch >> cleanup attached. > > Do you want it in mainline before 4.6-final? If that can wait until 4.7-rc1 > (and these are both old and not earth-shattering), I've no problem with > putting the entire series (including cleanup) into a branch merged into > vfs.git#for-next; if you consider it 4.6-final fodder, it's probably better > be your pull request. They are old, but I don't mind taking care of them now, and seem low risk. > PS: are there any docs re setup for cifs testing? There are probably more but I have been using the page https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Xfstesting-cifs cifs has more xfstest issues than NFS, but some of the same kinds of problems (caching of metadata time stamps e.g.) are similar. -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
