On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:10:14AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 09:19:05AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 06:17:35AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 09:17:24AM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > > > Add richacl xattr handler implementing the xattr operations based on the > > > > get_richacl and set_richacl inode operations. > > > > > > Given all the issues with Posix ACLs and selinux attributes these really > > > should be proper syscalls instead of abusing the xattr interface. > > > > What are those problems exactly? > > That people get confused between the attr used by the xattr syscall > interface and the attr used to store things on disk or the protocol. > This has happened every time we have non-native support, e.g. XFS, NFS, > CIFS, ntfs, etc. And it's only going to become worse. How has that confusion caused problems in practice? --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
