On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 05:38:30PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > + if (size < inode->i_size) {
> > + return locks_mandatory_area(filp, size, inode->i_size - 1,
> > + true);
> > + } else {
> > + return locks_mandatory_area(filp, inode->i_size, size - 1,
> > + true);
>
> I feel like these callers would be just slightly more self-documenting
> if that last parameter was F_WRLCK instead of true.
Sure, I can change that forthe next version.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
