Andreas, On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 3:03 AM, Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ richacl_alloc(int count, gfp_t gfp) >> struct richacl *acl = kzalloc(size, gfp); >> >> if (acl) { >> - atomic_set(&acl->a_refcount, 1); >> + atomic_set(&acl->a_base.ba_refcount, 1); >> acl->a_count = count; >> } >> return acl; >> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ richacl_clone(const struct richacl *acl, gfp_t gfp) >> >> if (dup) { >> memcpy(dup, acl, size); >> - atomic_set(&dup->a_refcount, 1); >> + atomic_set(&dup->a_base.ba_refcount, 1); > > These two calls should be base_acl_init(). Yes. This should all be fixed in the next snapshot. Thanks, Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html