On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 06:42:57AM -0800, Jeff Layton wrote: > > I'd suggest keeping an open coded loop in locks_remove_flock, which > > should both be more efficient and easier to review. > > > > I don't know. On the one hand, I rather like keeping all of the lock > removal logic in a single spot. On the other hand, we do take and drop > the i_lock/flc_lock more than once with this scheme if there are both > flock locks and leases present at the time of the close. Open coding > the loops would allow us to do that just once. > > I'll ponder it a bit more for the next iteration... FYI, I like the split into locks_remove_flock, it's just that flock_lock_file is giant mess. If it helps you feel free to keep it as-is for now and just document what you did in the changelog in detail. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
