On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 10:41:10AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > It's unlikely to ever occur, but if there were already a lease set on > the file then we could end up getting back a different pointer on a > successful setlease attempt than the one we allocated. If that happens, > the one we allocated could leak. > > In practice, I don't think this will happen due to the fact that we only > try to set up the lease once per nfs4_file, but this error handling is a > bit more correct given the current lease API. > > Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
