RE: [PATCH 2/7] cifs: Allow directIO read/write during cache=strict

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> What if a file is opened twice - once with o_direct and once without?
> what happens?
IMHO nothing bad happens.
Per file file->fop is initialized to inode->i_fop in do_dentry_open.
We are not changing inode->i_fop, so they still point to cached file operations.
The file which is open with O_DIRECT will get its fop changed to
cifs_file_direct_ops while the other file can still use cifs_file_strict_ops.
Also, while checking, I notice that additional check for CIFS_MOUNT_NO_BRL is
needed.
if (cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NO_BRL)
        inode->i_fop = &cifs_file_direct_nobrl_ops;
else
        inode->i_fop = &cifs_file_direct_ops;
If there is no objection, I will send v2 included above additional check.

Thanks.
> 
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Currently cifs have all or nothing approach for directIO operations.
> > cache=strict mode does not allow directIO while cache=none mode performs
> > all the operations as directIO even when user does not specify O_DIRECT
> > flag. This patch enables strict cache mode to honour directIO semantics.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <a.sangwan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/cifs/dir.c  |    4 ++++
> >  fs/cifs/file.c |    4 ++++
> >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/cifs/dir.c b/fs/cifs/dir.c
> > index 3db0c5f..30e377c 100644
> > --- a/fs/cifs/dir.c
> > +++ b/fs/cifs/dir.c
> > @@ -497,6 +497,10 @@ cifs_atomic_open(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *direntry,
> >                 goto out;
> >         }
> >
> > +       if (file->f_flags & O_DIRECT &&
> > +           CIFS_SB(inode->i_sb)->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_STRICT_IO)
> > +               file->f_op = &cifs_file_direct_ops;
> > +
> >         file_info = cifs_new_fileinfo(&fid, file, tlink, oplock);
> >         if (file_info == NULL) {
> >                 if (server->ops->close)
> > diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
> > index bee733e..0d07740 100644
> > --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> > +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
> > @@ -467,6 +467,10 @@ int cifs_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> >         cifs_dbg(FYI, "inode = 0x%p file flags are 0x%x for %s\n",
> >                  inode, file->f_flags, full_path);
> >
> > +       if (file->f_flags & O_DIRECT &&
> > +           cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_STRICT_IO)
> > +               file->f_op = &cifs_file_direct_ops;
> > +
> >         if (server->oplocks)
> >                 oplock = REQ_OPLOCK;
> >         else
> > --
> > 1.7.7
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux