On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Bob Balsover <cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Why not just use DFS? I believe that this is what it was designed for. > > -Bob Yes. DFS should be used for this. Fairly easy to setup on server (Samba or Windows or NetApp, although very different setup on Samba than Windows) and the client supports it (whether Linux or Windows). >> Hi >> Is it possible to have cifs SRV rrs like ldap and kerberos where clients >> can look for the service themselves? We'd like to be able to offer >> shares on more than one server without the cluster stuff. >> >> ATM we have e.g. >> mount -t cifs //server/share -owhatever >> >> Our question is, would having cifs SRV be a way around having to >> specify a specific server? -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html