On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>vers=2.0 does not work?
Well, actually vers=2.0 does work fine! Thanks for the suggestion! :) I did try it earlier, but probably did not have all the other things in place by then, because I know it didn't work then, but it does now.
I wonder why nothing above vers=2.0 works though, any ideas?
>On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Karin Hedlund <karin.hedlund@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> What I said about wireshark was all wrong! So sorry, my bad!
>>(I had another device connected also, and it was that device's SMB protocol negotiation I saw now that I look at it again).
>>
>>For this specific problem and device I get only one request and one
>> response, and yes, it's indeed SMB protocol version 2 they're trying to negotiate. But I get NegotiateProcotol Response, Error: STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>Is it possible to attach wireshark trace here?
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>Shirish
>>
>> No, unfortunately I can't post the wireshark trace. Sorry about that. I've attached wireshark screenshots for the SMB request and response packets though, hopefully it's better than nothing.
>>
>>>On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Karin Hedlund <karin.hedlund@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> From an embedded device, I'm trying to mount a samba share using SMB2, with the 'vers=2.1' mount option, but I don't seem to get it to work, so I was hoping somebody could maybe shed some light.
>>>>
>>>> mount -t cifs //192.168.0.1/networkshare /tmp/nas -o
>>>> username=,password=,vers=2.1,nounix,noserverino,uid=123,gid=123,nobr
>>>> l,
>>>> file_mode=0770,dir_mode=0770,iocharset=utf8
>>>> mount: mounting //192.168.0.1/networkshare on /tmp/nas failed:
>>>> Invalid argument
>>>>
>>>>Client: Embedded device with Linux 3.14 kernel, BusyBox version
>>>> v1.20.2p3 I have enabled and built the embedded device's kernel with CONFIG_CIFS_SMB2.
>>>> /proc/fs/cifs/DebugData:
>>>> CIFS Version 2.02
>>>> Features:
>>>> Active VFS Requests: 0
>>>> Servers:
>>>>
>>>> dmesg:
>>>> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: Devname:
>>>> //192.168.0.1/networkshare flags: 32768 <7>[ 3937.470000]
>>>> fs/cifs/connect.c: iocharset set to utf8 <7>[ 3937.470000]
>>>> fs/cifs/connect.c: Anonymous login <7>[ 3937.470000]
>>>> fs/cifs/connect.c: file mode: 0x1f8 dir mode: 0x1f8 <7>[
>>>> 3937.470000]
>>>> fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_mount as Xid: 2 with uid: 0
>>>> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: UNC: \\192.168.0.1\networkshare
>>>> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: Socket created <7>[
>>>> 3937.470000]
>>>> fs/cifs/connect.c: sndbuf 16384 rcvbuf 87380 rcvtimeo 0x2bc <7>[
>>>> 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: in cifs_get_smb_ses as Xid:
>>>> 3 with uid: 0 <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: Existing smb sess
>>>> not found <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: Negotiate protocol
>>>> <7>[ 3937.470000] fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: smb_len=102 <7>[
>>>> 3937.470000] fs/cifs/connect.c: Demultiplex PID: 3359 <7>[
>>>> 3937.480000] fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0x49 <7>[
>>>> 3937.480000]
>>>> fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: smb2_check_message length: 0x4d, smb_buf_length:
>>>> 0x49 <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 data length 0 offset
>>>> 0 <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: SMB2 len 77 <7>[
>>>> 3937.480000]
>>>> fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=0 mid=0 state=4 <7>[
>>>> 3937.480000] fs/cifs/smb2maperror.c: Mapping SMB2 status code
>>>> -1073741811 to POSIX err -22 <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/misc.c: Null
>>>> buffer passed to cifs_small_buf_release <7>[ 3937.480000]
>>>> fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_get_smb_ses (xid = 3) rc =
>>>> -22 <7>[ 3937.480000] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving
>>>> cifs_mount (xid = 2) rc = -22
>>>>
>>>> Server: Samba 3.6.6 on Debian Wheezy I do have the max protocol =
>>>> SMB2 under my [global] section in my samba.conf, and have restarted samba.
>>>>
>>>> I've also tried to look at the communication over wireshark, and I do see several SMB Negotiate Protocol requests and responses, but in all of the requests there's just "Requested Dialects: Dialect: NT LM 0.12, and in all the responses same thing, Dialect Index:0 NT LM 0.12 - which, as far as I know corresponds to SMB version 1 (?), not the 2.1 version I was hoping for...
>>>>
>>>> I'm lost here. I thought this was all one needed to do. So, any thoughts, insights or ideas would make me very happy. Thanks you guys!
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Karin
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
