On Tuesday 03 June 2014 14:33:10 Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > I think John Stultz and Thomas Gleixner have already started looking > > at how the timekeeping code can be updated. Once that is done, we should > > be able to add a functional 64-bit gettimeofday/settimeofday syscall > > pair. While I definitely agree this is one of the most basic things to > > have, it's also not an area of the kernel that is easy to change. > > 64-bit clock_gettime / clock_settime instead of gettimeofday / > settimeofday should avoid the need for the kernel to have a 64-bit version > of struct timeval. (Userspace 64-bit gettimeofday / settimeofday would > need to use a combination of the syscalls if the tz pointer is non-NULL.) Yes, that's what I meant. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
