On Saturday 31 May 2014 18:30:49 Vyacheslav Dubeyko wrote: > By the way, what about NILFS2? Is NILFS2 ready for suggested approach > without any changes? nilfs2 and a lot of other file systems don't need any changes for this, because they don't assign the inode time stamp fields to a 'struct timespec'. FWIW, nilfs2 uses a 64-bit seconds value, which is always safe and can represent the full range of user space timespec on all machines. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
