Am 10.03.2014 20:52, schrieb Steve French:
> There are some quick obvious things to check:
> 1) since server is Samba - check if unix extensions negotiated and
> check default rsize
> (you can simply do cat /proc/mounts to see what was negotiated)
>
> 2) with unix extensions enabled, the maximum read size (and write
> size) is much larger (which usually should help) so check if
> differences in rsize or wsize can explain performance differences.
>
> 3) Similarly, increasing the maximum number of simultaneous requests
> that the server can support for each client can have an impact on
> performance ("max mux = 50" is the default in the server's smb.conf
> but it can be increased if your workload has many requests from one
> client at the same time).
Thanks Steve for your helpful pointers.
The first three points had no effect in my particular case.
> 4) caching behavior changes - we moved to a much stricter caching
> policy ("cache=strict") on later kernels so mounting with
> "cache=loose," and allowing more efficient client side write caching
> which is usually sufficient for most workloads, may also help.
The cache mode was the nail that hit it. The cache modes had a dramatic impact
on the CIFS mount read speed:
~29 MB/s with "cache=loose"
<800 kB/s with "cache=strict"
Having read the discussion that lead to this change in 3.7
(https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2012-April/083228.html), I now
understand the reason for the default cache coherency strictness; albeit "a
little slower" is quite an understatement in my case.
Thanks,
Rolf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
