On 11/12/2013 06:35 PM, David Howells wrote:
uint64_t st_ino;
uint64_t st_size;
uint64_t st_blocks;
Should this include zeroed fields for 128 bit forward compatibility?
Windows SIDs would be expressed as extended attributes and therefore are
not needed to be presented here, correct? What about the presence of
alternate data streams/resource forks?
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
