should we propagate SMB error codes further?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm seeing same interesting errors running against a server from a big
NAS vendor that shall remain unnamed:

p224160.955651] CIFS VFS: Unexpected lookup error -5
[224161.298853] CIFS VFS: Unexpected lookup error -5
[224161.643559] CIFS VFS: Unexpected lookup error -5
[224161.992309] CIFS VFS: Unexpected lookup error -5
[224162.333310] CIFS VFS: Unexpected lookup error -5
[224162.677982] CIFS VFS: Unexpected lookup error -5

Unfortunately it seems like a EIO is the catchall for unknown SMB
errors, so trying to debug this seems a bit hard.  Should we maybe look
into propagating the SMB error codes further up the chain inside the
cifs driver instead of converting them at a fairly low level?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux