On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2013/11/19 Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>: >> From e4608aa57f9948a5e160ecb8590c885f76796e34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:58:08 -0600 >> Subject: [PATCH] [CIFS] Check SMB3 dialects against downgrade attacks >> >> When we are running SMB3 or SMB3.02 connections which are signed >> we need to validate the protocol negotiation information, >> to ensure that thenegotiate protocol response was not tampered with. >> >> Add the missing FSCTL which is sent at mount time (immediately after >> the SMB3 Tree Connect) to validate that the capabilities match >> what we think the server sent. >> >> "Secure dialect negotiation is introduced in SMB3 to protect against >> man-in-the-middle attempt to downgrade dialect negotiation. >> The idea is to prevent an eavesdropper from downgrading the initially >> negotiated dialect and capabilities between the client and the server." >> >> For more explanation see 2.2.31.4 of MS-SMB2 or >> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/openspecification/archive/2012/06/28/smb3-secure-dialect-negotiation.aspx >> >> Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> fs/cifs/cifsglob.h | 1 + >> fs/cifs/smb2ops.c | 1 + >> fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> fs/cifs/smb2pdu.h | 12 ++++++--- >> fs/cifs/smb2proto.h | 1 + >> fs/cifs/smbfsctl.h | 2 +- >> 6 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h >> index d9ea7ad..f918a99 100644 >> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h >> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h >> @@ -384,6 +384,7 @@ struct smb_version_operations { >> int (*clone_range)(const unsigned int, struct cifsFileInfo *src_file, >> struct cifsFileInfo *target_file, u64 src_off, u64 len, >> u64 dest_off); >> + int (*validate_negotiate)(const unsigned int, struct cifs_tcon *); >> }; >> >> struct smb_version_values { >> diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c b/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c >> index a3968ee..757da3e 100644 >> --- a/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c >> +++ b/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c >> @@ -1319,6 +1319,7 @@ struct smb_version_operations smb30_operations = { >> .create_lease_buf = smb3_create_lease_buf, >> .parse_lease_buf = smb3_parse_lease_buf, >> .clone_range = smb2_clone_range, >> + .validate_negotiate = smb3_validate_negotiate, >> }; >> >> struct smb_version_values smb20_values = { >> diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c b/fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c >> index 1e136ee..7756f9b 100644 >> --- a/fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c >> +++ b/fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c >> @@ -454,6 +454,80 @@ neg_exit: >> return rc; >> } >> >> +int smb3_validate_negotiate(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_tcon *tcon) >> +{ >> + int rc = 0; >> + struct validate_negotiate_info_req vneg_inbuf; >> + struct validate_negotiate_info_rsp *pneg_rsp; >> + u32 rsplen; >> + >> + cifs_dbg(VFS, "validate negotiate "); >> + vneg_inbuf.Capabilities = >> + cpu_to_le32(tcon->ses->server->vals->req_capabilities); >> + memcpy(vneg_inbuf.Guid, cifs_client_guid, SMB2_CLIENT_GUID_SIZE); >> + >> + /* >> + * validation ioctl must be signed, so no point sending this if we >> + * can not sign it. We could eventually change this to selectively >> + * sign just this, the first and only signed request on a connection. >> + * This is good enough for now since a user who wants better security >> + * would also enable signing on the mount. Having validation of >> + * negotiate info for signed connections helps reduce attack vectors >> + */ >> + if (tcon->ses->server->sign == false) >> + return 0; /* validation requires signing */ > > Shouldn't we move the above check and comments before we set > Capabilities and Guid of vneg_inbuf? Yes - will do -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
