Will Delete on close attribute also be set when link count is (validly) 0. Might be good question for dochelp On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Jim McDonough <jmcd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> The only other thing I see is that the code in cifs_all_info_to_fattr >> ought to be changed to use this flag and not try to fake up the >> cf_nlink value. > Ok, after looking a bit more, I'm not sure how we would know what to > do. If we're doing a qpathinfo for all_info, aren't we always getting > a value for nlink? How would we determine whether it needs to be > "fixed" or not? Do we just assume that for all non-unix cases we > can't trust it? > > > -- > Jim McDonough > Samba Team > SUSE labs > jmcd at samba dot org > jmcd at themcdonoughs dot org > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
