On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 16:08 +0400, Pavel Shilovsky wrote: > 2013/7/31 Simo <s@xxxxxxxxx>: > > On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 09:42 +0400, Pavel Shilovsky wrote: > >> 2013/7/30 Simo <s@xxxxxxxxx>: > >> > Are you using unix extensions on SMB1 ? > >> > >> Yes. > > > > Well then that's likely the explanation, with Unix Extensions you gate > > case-sensitive matching, without (SMB2) you get standard Windows > > case-insensitive matching (on the server). > > The problem is that the behavior is different for the same share with > Unix Ext on during negotiating SMB1 protocol and it depends on 'sec=' > mount option. > Are you saying unix extensions are negotiate differently for SMB1 depdending on the sec option ? That would be a bug. If you are saying SMB2 behaves differently than SMB1 then that is normal as there are no unix extensions over SMB2 yet. Simo. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
