Re: DFS referrals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:45:48 +0200
Marcus Moeller <marcus.moeller@xxxxxx> wrote:

> Am 29.07.2013 15:07, schrieb Jeff Layton:
> > I generally don't do 1:1 support unless you're paying me, so cc'ing
> > linux-cifs ml:
> 
> Ok, replying to the list as well.
> 
> > [...]
> >
> > On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 14:50:03 +0200
> > Marcus Moeller <marcus.moeller@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> [  124.607810] fs/cifs/cifssmb.c: negprot rc 0
> >> [  124.607814] fs/cifs/connect.c: Security Mode: 0xf Capabilities: 0x8001f3fc TimeAdjust: -7200
> >> [  124.607817] fs/cifs/sess.c: sess setup type 4
> >> [  124.607826] fs/cifs/cifs_spnego.c: key description = ver=0x2;host=d.ethz.ch;ip4=82.130.70.6;sec=krb5;uid=0xaf05;creduid=0xaf05;user=mam4tst;pid=0x61a
> >> [  124.803185] fs/cifs/sess.c: ssetup freeing small buf ffff88022c31a000
> >> [  124.803195] CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -126
> >> [  124.803203] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_get_smb_ses (xid = 5) rc = -126
> >> [  124.803212] fs/cifs/fscache.c: cifs_fscache_release_client_cookie: (0xffff88022a1b6000/0xffff88022a6430f0)
> >> [  124.803368] fs/cifs/connect.c: CIFS VFS: leaving cifs_mount (xid = 4) rc = -126
> >> [  124.803374] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -126
> >
> > The only failure I see is the one above, and that's because it failed
> > to upcall for the correct key. Are you sure you have krb5 creds as that
> > user?
> 
> Yes, creds are there and it also works when mounting from one of the 
> servers directly.
> 
> Only mounting using the domainname does not work.
> 
> 
> >> [  131.324798] fs/cifs/cifssmb.c: negprot rc 0
> >> [  131.324804] fs/cifs/connect.c: Security Mode: 0xf Capabilities: 0x8001f3fc TimeAdjust: -7200
> >> [  131.324808] fs/cifs/sess.c: sess setup type 4
> >> [  131.324821] fs/cifs/cifs_spnego.c: key description = ver=0x2;host=d.ethz.ch;ip4=172.31.65.62;sec=krb5;uid=0xaf05;creduid=0xaf05;user=mam4tst;pid=0x62c
> >> [  131.384335] fs/cifs/transport.c: For smb_command 115
> >> [  131.384344] fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb: smb_len=1666
> >> [  131.387043] fs/cifs/connect.c: RFC1002 header 0xf9
> >> [  131.387055] fs/cifs/misc.c: checkSMB Length: 0xfd, smb_buf_length: 0xf9
> >> [  131.387095] fs/cifs/transport.c: cifs_sync_mid_result: cmd=115 mid=2 state=4
> >> [  131.387100] fs/cifs/misc.c: Null buffer passed to cifs_small_buf_release
> >
> > Here' the upcall for a similar set of creds worked fine. The only thing
> > that seems to have changed in the key description is the IP address.
> >
> > Do you have cifs.upcall set up to use the --trust-dns flag? If so, why?
> 
> A relict from the past. I have removed it from the config. Thanks for 
> pointing out.
> 
> Greets
> Marcus
> 
> 
> 

Ok. Does removing that make any difference? 

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux