Wouldn't this be a candidate for stable?
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2013/7/7 Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> While playing a file from a CIFS-mounted samba share (over wireless,
>> if that matters), I got this deadlock:
>>
>> [ 2164.132440] =============================================
>> [ 2164.132443] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
>> [ 2164.132446] 3.10.0-rc7-rafael+ #26 Tainted: G C
>> [ 2164.132448] ---------------------------------------------
>> [ 2164.132452] vlc/2370 is trying to acquire lock:
>> [ 2164.132454] (&cifsi->lock_sem){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffffa0913110>]
>> cifs_reopen_file+0x270/0x5b0 [cifs]
>> [ 2164.132472]
>> but task is already holding lock:
>> [ 2164.132475] (&cifsi->lock_sem){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffffa0918ca8>]
>> cifs_strict_readv+0x88/0x160 [cifs]
>> [ 2164.132488]
>> other info that might help us debug this:
>> [ 2164.132491] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>>
>> [ 2164.132494] CPU0
>> [ 2164.132496] ----
>> [ 2164.132498] lock(&cifsi->lock_sem);
>> [ 2164.132502] lock(&cifsi->lock_sem);
>> [ 2164.132505]
>> *** DEADLOCK ***
>>
>> [ 2164.132508] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
>>
>> [ 2164.132511] 1 lock held by vlc/2370:
>> [ 2164.132513] #0: (&cifsi->lock_sem){++++.+}, at:
>> [<ffffffffa0918ca8>] cifs_strict_readv+0x88/0x160 [cifs]
>> [ 2164.132526]
>> stack backtrace:
>> [ 2164.132531] CPU: 3 PID: 2370 Comm: vlc Tainted: G C
>> 3.10.0-rc7-rafael+ #26
>> [ 2164.132534] Hardware name: Sony Corporation VPCZ23A4R/VAIO, BIOS
>> R1013H5 05/21/2012
>> [ 2164.132537] ffff880235033f80 ffff8802281fb958 ffffffff8165b7ae
>> ffff8802281fba48
>> [ 2164.132544] ffffffff810a0042 ffff8802281fb978 ffffffff826360d0
>> ffff8802281fb9c8
>> [ 2164.132550] 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000000389b0
>> ffff880200000542
>> [ 2164.132556] Call Trace:
>> [ 2164.132564] [<ffffffff8165b7ae>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
>> [ 2164.132569] [<ffffffff810a0042>] __lock_acquire+0x1522/0x1ee0
>> [ 2164.132579] [<ffffffffa091aa41>] ? cifs_get_inode_info+0x181/0x690 [cifs]
>> [ 2164.132587] [<ffffffffa0913110>] ? cifs_reopen_file+0x270/0x5b0 [cifs]
>> [ 2164.132591] [<ffffffff810a1027>] lock_acquire+0x87/0x150
>> [ 2164.132598] [<ffffffffa0913110>] ? cifs_reopen_file+0x270/0x5b0 [cifs]
>> [ 2164.132604] [<ffffffff8165ed3f>] down_write+0x3f/0x70
>> [ 2164.132612] [<ffffffffa0913110>] ? cifs_reopen_file+0x270/0x5b0 [cifs]
>> [ 2164.132622] [<ffffffffa0927a76>] ? cifs_set_fid+0x26/0x40 [cifs]
>> [ 2164.132632] [<ffffffffa0913110>] cifs_reopen_file+0x270/0x5b0 [cifs]
>> [ 2164.132642] [<ffffffffa0913d0b>] cifs_readpage_worker+0x1ab/0x4e0 [cifs]
>> [ 2164.132652] [<ffffffffa091427e>] cifs_readpage+0x5e/0x160 [cifs]
>> [ 2164.132660] [<ffffffff81109b87>] generic_file_aio_read+0x217/0x760
>> [ 2164.132670] [<ffffffffa0918d51>] cifs_strict_readv+0x131/0x160 [cifs]
>> [ 2164.132675] [<ffffffff8116fff5>] do_sync_read+0x75/0xb0
>> [ 2164.132681] [<ffffffff81170ef7>] vfs_read+0xa7/0x180
>> [ 2164.132686] [<ffffffff81171170>] SyS_read+0x50/0xa0
>> [ 2164.132691] [<ffffffff81668e16>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f
>>
>> --
>> Alexander E. Patrakov
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> Thank you for pointing it out. I created a patch that should fix the
> problem - will sent separately.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Pavel Shilovsky.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Thanks,
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
