server and ses->server are the same, but it's a little bit ugly that we
lock &ses->server->srv_mutex and unlock &server->srv_mutex. It causes
a false positive in Smatch about inconsistent locking.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c
index edb2220..e3a0f81 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
@@ -3826,7 +3826,7 @@ cifs_setup_session(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_ses *ses,
if (rc) {
cifs_dbg(VFS, "Send error in SessSetup = %d\n", rc);
} else {
- mutex_lock(&ses->server->srv_mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&server->srv_mutex);
if (!server->session_estab) {
server->session_key.response = ses->auth_key.response;
server->session_key.len = ses->auth_key.len;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
