Re: Writes greater than 64k fails with -ENOSPC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:22:15 +0530
Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 01/30/2013 09:36 PM, Tom Talpey wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jeff Layton [mailto:jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:37 AM
> >> To: Tom Talpey
> >> Cc: Suresh Jayaraman; linux-cifs
> >> Subject: Re: Writes greater than 64k fails with -ENOSPC
> 
> >>
> >> The spec is not 100% clear on whether servers are *required* to support
> >> arbitrarily large writes up to the 128k limit. Clearly there are some that do
> >> not, and a larger default is problematic against those servers.
> > 
> > I'd be very interested to see traces of negotiate, large read and large write from such a server.
> 
> I'm not sure whether I can share the complete trace (without customer's
> permission) but I can get you the specific bits that might be
> interesting. I have asked for a full trace (including negotiate protocol).
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 

We probably don't need the whole capture. Just the "Capabilities" and
"MaxBufferSize" values from the NEGOTIATE would be enough...

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux