On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 14:04:23 -0600 Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I am not as worried about code cleanliness as I am about losing function, > especially as it is sometimes hard to figure out how many users would be > affected by removing function. I mildly prefer leaving the nfs syntax > if it makes it easier for nfs users to use smb3, but we could make a stub > mount helper that parses nfs syntax and simply calls mount.cifs if you > prefer that approach - in any case I don't feel strongly about nfs syntax. > > On the question of domain name - since Samba uses that form for > username (which allows domain and username and password to be overloaded) -- > how do samba utilities deal with the conflict you are trying to fix by removing > support for including domain\user%password? > Do the samba client utilities even have the ability to use a keytab at all? My understanding is that you must already have a TGT in order to use them with krb5 auth. In any case, the smbclient manpage doesn't list DOMAIN/user as valid syntax for the -U option. I think you're expected to use -W to supply a domain name. -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
