On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 17:55:41 +0400 Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2012/11/28 Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > There's also a lot of logic around what sort of locking you're doing > > here too. I think we ought to do the same sort of I/O regardless of > > whether POSIX locks are being used or not. > > We can use cifs_writev for both POSIX and mandatory variants but I > divided them to make POSIX variant work faster (no need to check hold > a semaphore, walk through a lock list, etc). > Refresh my memory -- why do we need to handle writes differently when POSIX vs. non-POSIX locking is in force? It seems to me that that shouldn't matter and the behavior should be solely a function of what sort of oplock you have. -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
