On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 5:11 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 20:48:40 -0600 >> Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> it doesn't change security flags - but it seemed the smallest and >>> safest since it basically says: >>> 1) if you pass in "sec=" then use that >>> 2) otherwise use ntlmssp (with ntlmv2) >>> >>> so shouldn't have any unintended consequences (and the sign mount >>> option should work as expected as well) >>> >> >> Umm...I think it would. The story for people who need to mount using >> cleartext passwords has always been "Set SecurityFlags to a magic value >> and mount without a sec= option". With your original patch, that would >> have broken them, AFAICT. you are probably right (sec=none was obviously for null user not plain text password) -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
