On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:45:46 +0200
Martijn de Gouw <martijn.de.gouw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Setting this secFlg allows usage of dfs where some servers require
> signing and others don't.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martijn de Gouw <martijn.de.gouw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> :100644 100644 b39bb4a... 4da9dd3... M fs/cifs/connect.c
> fs/cifs/connect.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> index b39bb4a..4da9dd3 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> @@ -994,7 +994,7 @@ static int cifs_parse_security_flavors(char *value,
>
> switch (match_token(value, cifs_secflavor_tokens, args)) {
> case Opt_sec_krb5:
> - vol->secFlg |= CIFSSEC_MAY_KRB5;
> + vol->secFlg |= CIFSSEC_MAY_KRB5 | CIFSSEC_MAY_SIGN;
> break;
> case Opt_sec_krb5i:
> vol->secFlg |= CIFSSEC_MAY_KRB5 | CIFSSEC_MUST_SIGN;
Looks like a reasonable bandaid until someone overhauls the auth
selection code for sanity...
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
