Hi all, thank you for great communication with you, I was not hoping that someone will actually answer me. This looks to me that we are not yet doomed:) and anyway where is the network in perfect condition...am I right? :-) however I am not aware of any outage, depending how much network this needs. Packets are lost here and there everyday... This doesn't seems to be a trouble problem as nobody is complaining but this bothers me because it fills my /var/log/messages and informs me every time. I first saw these messages and didn't find any explanation for them. I thought that it would be nice to have a comments on the errors so if also other people get error they can look it up in Wiki or somewhere. I think that in the Internet are plenty of questions but not real answers. And to be it reliable message I though you guys could make something because you are the ones who can:) Steve already explained very nicely "cmd 50 response" which is time out on listing files, directories and others. Which i know can occur in network disturbance. Here are again the errors still getting: kernel: CIFS VFS: Send error in Close = -11. kernel: CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -5. kernel: CIFS VFS: Unexpected lookup error -6. I have not checked running CIFS on newer kernel version yet. I ll have to find some servers first. I thought this is something that I could ignore or filter from my messages as this I thought may be let's say access denied or connection closed by other side but again if I do that I just think if i m not going to miss some big problem then. Thank you all, Best Regards, Robin Cernin On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 09:33 +0200, ROBIN CERNIN wrote: >> Hello, >> >> First of all I wanna say you are doing great job developing cif-utils. >> Secondly I have question on using following version of cifs: >> >> filename: /lib/modules/2.6.18-308.8.1. >> el5/kernel/fs/cifs/cifs.ko >> version: 1.60RH >> description: VFS to access servers complying with the SNIA CIFS >> Specification e.g. Samba and Windows >> license: GPL >> author: Steve French <sfrench@xxxxxxxxxx> >> srcversion: 63D9396D38F380652744D7E >> depends: >> vermagic: 2.6.18-308.8.1.el5 SMP mod_unload gcc-4.1 >> parm: CIFSMaxBufSize:Network buffer size (not including >> header). Default: 16384 Range: 8192 to 130048 (int) >> parm: cifs_min_rcv:Network buffers in pool. Default: 4 >> Range: 1 to 64 (int) >> parm: cifs_min_small:Small network buffers in pool. Default: >> 30 Range: 2 to 256 (int) >> parm: cifs_max_pending:Simultaneous requests to server. >> Default: 50 Range: 2 to 256 (int) >> module_sig: 883f3504fa440f6a462ac2afa8e12f112b2f409f6ea4176acbbe7f2f2c13e944e9a17d507b429c09c8e9ef6118eb3d5c40fcbfa81c96bf86e626c06e >> >> on RHEL get following errors in the /var/log/messages: >> >> Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39222 >> Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39231 >> Sep 24 20:08:48 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 39236 >> Sep 25 10:45:16 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -5 >> Sep 25 10:45:16 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: Unexpected lookup error -5 >> Sep 25 13:08:25 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 6 mid 47208 >> Sep 25 16:50:27 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 162 mid 48857 >> Sep 25 20:07:37 xxxxxxx kernel: CIFS VFS: No response for cmd 50 mid 50442 >> >> >> Can you please clarify a bit to me what are these errors related to? I >> dont hear anyone complaing that this isnt working but I can still see >> these errors. > Hi Robin, > > Did you have any network outages or network congestion at those times? > It appears the client for some reason couldn't receive a response from > the server. > > Sachin Prabhu > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
