Hi folks, [MS-CIFS] in section 2.2.1.6.2 says, in part: --------------- The value 0xFFFF MUST NOT be used as a valid MID. All other possible values for MID, including zero (0x0000), are valid. The value 0xFFFF is used in an OpLock Break Notification request, which is an SMB_COM_LOCKING_ANDX Request (section 2.2.4.32.1) sent from the server. --------------- However, in smb1ops.c:cifs_get_next_mid I do not see where a MID value of 0xFFFF is skipped. Perhaps it is done somewhere else that I have not found, and if so, could someone point it out to me? -- Regards, Richard Sharpe (何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
