Re: Why do we use a global lock when manipulating MIDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Richard Sharpe
<realrichardsharpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am reading the code because I am interested in adding SMB2.2/3.0
> support around multi-connect.
>
> I noticed the following code, which confuses me.
>
>        /* put it on the pending_mid_q */
>        spin_lock(&GlobalMid_Lock);
>        list_add_tail(&mid->qhead, &server->pending_mid_q);
>        spin_unlock(&GlobalMid_Lock);
>
>        rc = cifs_sign_smb2(iov, nvec, server, &mid->sequence_number);
>        if (rc)
>                cifs_delete_mid(mid);
>        *ret_mid = mid;
>        return rc;
>
> Since MIDs are allocated on a per-server basis and the list that the
> new struct mid_q_entry is placed on is in the struct TCP_Server_Info
> why are we using GlobalMid_Lock. It seems that we could move that
> spinlock into struct TCP_Server_Info.
>
> What am I missing here?

Yes - probably could be moved to the srv_mutex in struct
TCP_Server_Info although it is unlikely to make a measurable
difference.

-- 
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux