Re: [PATCH] cifs: use standard token parser for mount options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 15:14 -0400, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
>         
>         > Are there any other options that are implicitly set?  Or,
>         more
>         > generally, will this solution scale?
>         
>         
>         For a one off case like this, a solution like this is
>         acceptable. If
>         there are more number of such options where we can could pass
>         a blank,
>         we could add some code to make parsing them easier.
>         
>         I don't see us facing much problems scaling here.
>         
>         Sachin Prabhu
>         
> 
> 
> Sorry if this seemed like a silly question, I'm just always curious
> about coding styles and studying the craft. I realized after I asked
> how silly it sounded. :)

I am in the same boat. We are all learning here.

Sachin Prabhu

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux