On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:04:29PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote: > > The folks at Microsoft (who are, of course, well ahead in their > SMB2.x implementations) are very surprised that we are trying to > maintain a single codebase for both protocols. (I heard the same > thing from several Microsoft engineers during separate > conversations.) That's just a misunderstanding of how our codebase is structured, that's all. The SMB1 parser/protocol engine is completely different code from the SMB2 parser/protocol engine in Samba. What is in common (as is also in common in Microsoft's codebase) is the code that implements the underlying file system functionality. They have a common NTFS (and now ReFS) codebase, we have a common map POSIX to Windows semantics layer. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
