Re: [PATCH] CIFS: Fix mkdir/rmdir bug for the non-POSIX case

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Currently we do inc_nlink/drop_nlink for a parent directory for every
> mkdir and rmdir calls. That's wrong when POSIX extensions are disabled
> because in this case a server doesn't do the same things and returns
> the old value on the next QueryInfo request. As the result, we update
> our value with the server one and then decrement it on every rmdir
> call - go to negative nlink values.
>
> Fix this by doing inc_nlink/drop_nlink for parent directory in mkdir
> and rmdir in POSIX case only. Also add cERROR when nlink value <= 2
> and we still try to decrement it (possible broken servers).
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/inode.c |   14 ++++++++++----
>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/inode.c b/fs/cifs/inode.c
> index a5f54b7..9af6ec7 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/inode.c
> @@ -1355,11 +1355,11 @@ mkdir_retry_old:
>                d_drop(direntry);
>        } else {
>  mkdir_get_info:
> -               inc_nlink(inode);
> -               if (pTcon->unix_ext)
> +               if (pTcon->unix_ext) {
> +                       inc_nlink(inode);
>                        rc = cifs_get_inode_info_unix(&newinode, full_path,
>                                                      inode->i_sb, xid);
> -               else
> +               } else
>                        rc = cifs_get_inode_info(&newinode, full_path, NULL,
>                                                 inode->i_sb, xid, NULL);
>
> @@ -1475,7 +1475,13 @@ int cifs_rmdir(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *direntry)
>        cifs_put_tlink(tlink);
>
>        if (!rc) {
> -               drop_nlink(inode);
> +               if (pTcon->unix_ext) {
> +                       if (inode->i_nlink > 2)
> +                               drop_nlink(inode);
> +                       else
> +                               cERROR(1, "%s: unexpected nlink number(%u)",
> +                                      __func__, inode->i_nlink);
> +               }
>                spin_lock(&direntry->d_inode->i_lock);
>                i_size_write(direntry->d_inode, 0);
>                clear_nlink(direntry->d_inode);
> --
> 1.7.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Then we need to apply the same logic to set_nlink() calls and
wherever we access i_nlink field also?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux