2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@xxxxxxxx> The stable release 2.6.32.32 added the upstream commit 12fed00de963433128b5366a21a55808fab2f756. However, one of the hunks of the original patch seems missing from the stable backport which can be found here: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.stable/5676 This hunk corresponds to the change in is_valid_oplock_break() at fs/cifs/misc.c. This patch backports the missing hunk and is against linux-2.6.32.y stable kernel. Cc: Steve French <sfrench@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx> --- fs/cifs/misc.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) --- a/fs/cifs/misc.c +++ b/fs/cifs/misc.c @@ -584,6 +584,9 @@ is_valid_oplock_break(struct smb_hdr *bu pCifsInode->clientCanCacheAll = false; if (pSMB->OplockLevel == 0) pCifsInode->clientCanCacheRead = false; + else if (pSMB->OplockLevel) + pCifsInode->clientCanCacheRead = true; + rc = slow_work_enqueue(&netfile->oplock_break); if (rc) { cERROR(1, ("failed to enqueue oplock " -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
