typo - I meant: With the proposed cifs.ko fix to honor maxmpx, cifs_max_pending becomes a limit when the server ... On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > (as Windows often is) has more than 50 > maxmpxct in its registry. Does anyone mind if I update the maximum > to one or two hundred? (after the mpx fix is in)? > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c >> index b0a2e16..fa67245 100644 >> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c >> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c >> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ module_param(cifs_min_small, int, 0); >> MODULE_PARM_DESC(cifs_min_small, "Small network buffers in pool. Default: 30 " >> "Range: 2 to 256"); >> unsigned int cifs_max_pending = CIFS_MAX_REQ; >> -module_param(cifs_max_pending, int, 0); >> +module_param(cifs_max_pending, int, 0444); >> MODULE_PARM_DESC(cifs_max_pending, "Simultaneous requests to server. " >> "Default: 50 Range: 2 to 256"); >> unsigned short echo_retries = 5; >> -- >> 1.7.6.4 >> >> > > > > -- > Thanks, > > Steve > -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
