On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:10:01AM -0500, Steve French wrote: > I prefer the change to unsigned int rather than u32 so it is clearer > that you are not casting the value from 64 bit to 32 bit on some > architectures. To avoid reformatting can't you can use "uint" if you > want the shorter form see: > > include/linux/types.h:typedef unsigned int uint; > Yes. That looks nicer. I'll resend. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
