On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 23:34:13 +0400 Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This patchset is going to simplify brlocking code and add the caching support for exclusive oplock cases. I splitted it into several independent parts - so, each can be applied separately once it's reviewed. > > This version of the patchset includes some code style improvements in patch #3. > > Any comments and testing are welcome! > The above description is a bit vague. Is this just a generic cleanup of the code, or does it represent any behavioral changes? > Pavel Shilovsky (6): > CIFS: Simplify byte range locking code > CIFS: Move byte range lock list from fd to inode > CIFS: Implement caching mechanism for mandatory brlocks > CIFS: Implement caching mechanism for posix brlocks > CIFS: Send as many mandatory unlock ranges at once as possible > CIFS: Make cifs_push_locks send as many locks at once as possible > > fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 3 +- > fs/cifs/cifsglob.h | 10 +- > fs/cifs/cifsproto.h | 9 +- > fs/cifs/cifssmb.c | 52 +++- > fs/cifs/file.c | 767 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 5 files changed, 661 insertions(+), 180 deletions(-) > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
