Re: async read patchset test results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Today, I caught it once again and didn't noticed any reconnects (no cERRORs).

It is surely not depends on Jeff's async read patchset, because I used
my cifs-3.2-current branch.

My branch consists of Steve's master + lockpatchset + smb2 patches.
>From another hand, previously I caught it with Jeff's branch (without
lockpatchset and smb2 patches). So, that's why the problem is in
existing cifs code now.

FYI: I checked two files: "buggy" and original, and noticed that the
difference between them is located in one place - positions from
2014442 to 2014569 - 126 differences with two equal holes.

So, 2014569 - 2014442 + 1 = 128 wrong bytes. Ideas?

-- 
Best regards,
Pavel Shilovsky.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux