Re: Should multiuser imply "noperm" mount option?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:12:20 -0500
Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If multiuser mount is enabled and we are getting and sending the
> "correct" credentials - should we enable noperm by default (so we
> don't do client side permission checking unless we are mounted as
> single user - no multiuser)
> 

It already does that. From the multiuser section of the
mount.cifs manpage:

          "With this change, it's feasible for the server to handle
           permissions enforcement, so this option also implies "noperm"."

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux