Re: broken mandatory locking behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:24:59 +0400
Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 2011/10/4 J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 06:54:51AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> >> I think this is tantamount to insisting that applications be specially
> >> written for cifs.ko if they want to do locking.
> >>
> >> The larger goal for cifs.ko (as I see it) is to allow applications to
> >> mostly run unchanged on top of windows servers. Naturally, this is
> >> impossible since windows doesn't follow POSIX semantics, so the best we
> >> can do is closely approximate it.
> >>
> >> There's certainly room for improvement here, but what you're proposing
> >> sounds like a step backward from that goal. It will break a lot of
> >> existing applications that run successfully on top of cifs.ko today.
> >
> > Right.  You can tell which kind of locking the application wants by the
> > interface it's using.  If the application is using fcntl F_GETLK,
> > F_SETLK, F_SETLKW, then chances are it was written assuming posix
> > semantics, so all we can do is emulate those as best as possible.
> >
> > If there are applications that need want the Windows semantics, then
> > we'd need to provide a new lock interface which promises them exactly
> > that.
> >
> > --b.
> >
> 
> Ok, I understand your and Jeff's idea - it's better to support POSIX
> at least partly than doesn't support it at all.
> 
> I don't think that we need VFS changes for the new mode, because it is
> cifs feature only. All that we need is to support this for cifs - so,
> it can be a new mount option or the existing one - now we have
> 'forcemand' mount option (that switch on mandatory locking even if the
> server support POSIX one) that can includes such a change. What do you
> think about it?
> 

I'm not a fan of adding more mount-option enabled hacks to cifs to
support wine. If wine or other applications need windows semantics,
then I would prefer to see you add proper vfs-level interfaces to
provide them.

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux