On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 09:02:40AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: >> The loop around lookup_one_len doesn't handle the case where it might >> return a negative dentry, which can cause an oops on the next pass >> through the loop. Check for that and break out of the loop with an >> error of -ENOENT if there is one. > > Ouch. Nice catch and that one is my damn fault. Do you want that one > to go through cifs or vfs tree? ACK, in any case... Probably safer to go through my tree, reduce chance of merge conflict Was planning on sending a merge request up soon in any case. -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
