There is only one in my tree that I see that I had not requested Linus to pull yet. cifs: set socket send and receive timeouts before attempting connect Looking at your tree there is one left to merge. I hadn't merged "cifs: simplify refcounting for oplock breaks" because I wanted to check it carefully (IIRC it wasn't "reviewed-by" anyone else) - but it looked fine. On " cifs: advertise the right receive buffer size to the... " it looks fine but didn't have a bug associated with it so prefer to wait for 3.0.1. On "cifs: demote DFS referral lookup errors to cFYI cifs-3.0" - before making this change I want to make sure that a misconfigured cifs.upcall will cause (ie at least one log entry to be logged until the client is rebooted) a kernel warning and that we don't make it harder to debug the case where cifs.upcall is missing or misconfigured by changing the error to a cFYI. I don't think the "unneeded variable initialization patch makes the code clearer and it doesn't fix a bug or warning - but don't have strong feelings about it either way. On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Steve, > > I notice that there are a number of patches that are still sitting in > your tree and that aren't yet in mainline. Do you have plans to ask > Linus to pull them? Also, it would be helpful if you would start cc'ing > linux-cifs when you send pull requests to him. I checked my email log I have cc:ed linux-cifs on pull requests for all but a few where I accidentally left off the email. > Thanks, > -- > Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> > -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
