Re: shrinking set of cifs fixes to merge for 2.6.39 to small set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:33:42 -0500
> Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Since it is already past the merge window (was waiting to discuss some
>> fixes with others at the fs summit last week before merge),  I shrunk
>> the list of cifs patches waiting for merge (in cifs-2.6.git) to a much
>> smaller set of more critical ones. See below. (I moved the others
>> temporarily to a for-2.6.40 branch in cifs-2.6.git).  We (Jeff,
>> Shirish, I etc.) need to build/test more with this set before sending
>> though.
>>
>> Jeff Layton (8):
>>       cifs: check for private_data before trying to put it
>>       cifs: replace /proc/fs/cifs/Experimental with a module parm
>
>        I think we should also put in the patch that adds the
>        page_mkwrite handler.

I agree but it had more merge conflicts.

>
> Other than that, this looks like a reasonable set. I'll plan to build
> it later today and give it some testing.
>
> --
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
>



-- 
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux