On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 09:41:34AM -0500, Steve French wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Btw, what branch are these commits for? ?I dearly hope you're not trying > > to push half-assed code to mainline. ?Please do your development on a > > branch first, and once there is a useable implementation it can be > > reviewed and synced over. ?Take a look at pnfs development for example. > > We have an implementation that was in the test tree for a year, went > through 3 test events that is being ported. I don't think it will > take more than a week or so to get enough of it in. Unless it gets > upstream, it is not going to get much wider review than from the > original group (Pavel, Jeremy etc). Note that all code is marked as > "broken" and the majority in distinct c files - this is not that > different than pNFS, which only recently got usable in mainline but > was checked in many releases back. Sorry, but that's bullshit. Please stop merging that crap in it's current state, and prepare a full patch series for review. Please include some broader list like linux-fsdevel when posting the full series. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
