On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 09:23:34 -0600 > Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> I was trying to avoid 'taking spinlock and searching through the tree' twice. > > You should only have to search the tree twice when there is no entry > present. The cost of searching the tree will be minimal vs. the cost of > allocating memory and performing an upcall. > > -- > Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> > Alright, will make the change and resubmit this patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
