On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 23:00:25 -0600 > shirishpargaonkar@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> From: Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> Allow setting cifs_acl on the server. >> Pass on to the server the ACL blob generated by an application. >> cifs is just a pass-through, server decides whether to enforce/apply >> the ACL blob composed by an application. >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@xxxxxxxxx> > > Seems sane enough and is probably more useful than trying to map all of > this to POSIX acl's and modes. I wonder though...if you do this, then > the permissions and possibly ownership change. Do you need to owner/group will not change, only the ACL (DACL). > invalidate the metadata for the inode at that point? > > -- > Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
