On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:27 PM, <shirishpargaonkar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> From: Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> Fix lanman (lm) authentication code. >> >> Change lm response length back to 24 from 16. >> Parse lanmani mount option. > > lanman21 (and earlier dialects) did not support packet signing > (requires NTLM12 or later dialect. I don't know what happens if > you try to set sec=lanmani with your patch > but I would not expect it to ever force signing and work. > > > We note this in our readme e.g. > sign Must use packet signing (helps avoid unwanted data modification > by intermediate systems in the route). Note that signing > does not work with lanman or plaintext authentication. Steve, is that a limitation within cifs client or protocol limitation? I think there is a session key calculation associated with lanman authentication. > > > -- > Thanks, > > Steve > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
