Re: [linux-cifs-client] can someone please explain the performance difference between mount.cifs and smbclient?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Le Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:54:10 -0500 vous écriviez:
>
>> cc'ing linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx which is the new mailing list...
>
> Damn, that's why I wasn't receiving messages from the list for a few
> months :)
>
>> Most likely you're seeing the result of a lack of parallelism in the
>> Linux kernel cifs client. It does not do async writes (yet), which
>> really hinders throughput.
>>
>> I'm hoping to get to work on that in the next few months unless
>> someone else beats me to it...
>
> Thank you. In the meanwhile I'll probably stick to NFS :)
>

With NFSv4 you get similar caching to cifs, but there are
cases where our testing shows CIFS faster - but not for
single process, single file i/o.


-- 
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux