Re: [PATCH 06/13] cifs: clean up handle_mid_response

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Make it use a switch statement based on the value of the midStatus. If
> the resp_buf is set, then MID_RESPONSE_RECEIVED is too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/transport.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/transport.c b/fs/cifs/transport.c
> index 0c0dadd..05ced17 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/transport.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/transport.c
> @@ -356,33 +356,33 @@ handle_mid_result(struct mid_q_entry *mid, struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
>  {
>        int rc = 0;
>
> -       spin_lock(&GlobalMid_Lock);
> +       cFYI(1, "%s: cmd=%d mid=%d state=%d", __func__, mid->command,
> +               mid->mid, mid->midState);
>
> -       if (mid->resp_buf) {
> +       spin_lock(&GlobalMid_Lock);
> +       switch (mid->midState) {
> +       case MID_RESPONSE_RECEIVED:
>                spin_unlock(&GlobalMid_Lock);
>                return rc;
> -       }
> -
> -       cERROR(1, "No response to cmd %d mid %d", mid->command, mid->mid);
> -       if (mid->midState == MID_REQUEST_SUBMITTED) {
> -               if (server->tcpStatus == CifsExiting)
> +       case MID_REQUEST_SUBMITTED:
> +               /* socket is going down, reject all calls */
> +               if (server->tcpStatus == CifsExiting) {
> +                       cERROR(1, "%s: canceling mid=%d cmd=0x%x state=%d",
> +                              __func__, mid->mid, mid->command, mid->midState);
>                        rc = -EHOSTDOWN;
> -               else
> -                       mid->midState = MID_RETRY_NEEDED;
> -       }
> -
> -       if (rc != -EHOSTDOWN) {
> -               if (mid->midState == MID_RETRY_NEEDED) {
> -                       rc = -EAGAIN;
> -                       cFYI(1, "marking request for retry");
> -               } else {
> -                       rc = -EIO;
> +                       break;
>                }
> +               mid->midState = MID_RETRY_NEEDED;

Would it be cleaner to set rc to -EAGAIN instead of setting state here
to fall down and then setting rc as -EAGAIN?

> +       case MID_RETRY_NEEDED:
> +               rc = -EAGAIN;
> +               break;
> +       default:
> +               cERROR(1, "%s: invalid mid state mid=%d state=%d", __func__,
> +                       mid->mid, mid->midState);
>        }
>        spin_unlock(&GlobalMid_Lock);
>
>        DeleteMidQEntry(mid);
> -       /* Update # of requests on wire to server */
>        atomic_dec(&server->inFlight);
>        wake_up(&server->request_q);
>
> --
> 1.7.3.2
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux